WebOther philosophers accept Hume's argument and thus build morality not merely on "is" statements but also on one or more "ought" statements. This is one typical view about what Hume himself did. Hume (the way many people read him) identified the is/ought gap and thus built a moral system that also has a few "oughts" in the premises, so that we can … WebAug 1, 2024 · This article addresses the social and historical relation between Chicago School neo-liberalism and contemporary racism, and its connections with the formations of racism in classical liberalism and its colonial character. I show the pragmatic and discursive operations of neo-racism in the context of this shift to a neo-liberal discourse, drawing …
(PDF) Hume, Causation and Counterfactuals - ResearchGate
WebNov 28, 2007 · In Hume's case, it is a stepping-stone to his mature philosophical scepticism, rather than the final product (as will be made clear below); but it is worth noting that he makes explicit use of a version of it in his argument against miracles: he commends Cardinal de Retz for concluding, in the face of impeccable testimony, that the miraculous … Webnotwithstanding—Hume does address the Ontological Argument, and takes himself to possess a compelling argument against it. I defend the view that Cleanthes’ argument in the infamously cryptic Dialogue IX forms the locus of Hume’s response to the Ontological Argument. Moreover, if we accept this cushions for a wicker couch
Locke and Hume on Consent - Pomona College
WebAug 30, 2024 · To Hume, we cannot know causation (cause and effect) by purely examining the relationship among ideas: e.g., we cannot get the idea of smoke from the idea of fire. So casualty is not analytic. So it must be synthetic, and when we examine our experiences relating causality, all we got are proximity in location, temporal concurrence, and constant ... WebMay 31, 2024 · While it might not be literally Hume’s view, it is certainly consistent with Hume, and is probably what Hume should say on causation, in light of recent developments in science and logic. As a ... WebPhilosophy is the practice of making and assessing arguments. An argument is a set of statements (called premises) that work together to support another statement (the conclusion). Making and assessing arguments can help us get closer to understanding the truth. At the very least, the process helps make us aware of our reasons for believing ... chase reserve card travel benefits