2024 Nissen v pierce county

Nissen v pierce county

Author: qlvn

August undefined, 2024

WebNov 8, 2016 · The Superior Court ruled in favor of West and ordered Vermillion, under penalty of perjury, to produce records within the scope of the request. On appeal, the Washington Court of Appeals held that the Washington State Supreme Court’s decision in Nissen v. Pierce County, 183 Wn.2d 863 (2015) controlled. WebAug 27, 2015 · The Court of Appeals reversed. Nissen v. Pierce County, 183 Wash.App. 581, 333 P.3d 577 (2014). Applying the PRA's definition of “public record,” the Court of Appeals … description date docket # in re: the dependency of a.m.f. march 30, 2024: no. …

Washington Supreme Court Applies Public Records Act to ... - K&L …

WebAug 27, 2015 · On August 27, 2015, the Washington Supreme Court issued a new decision inNissen v.Pierce County et al. (Case No. 90875-3), clarifying when records such as text messages and emails held by public employees on their personal devices or accounts may be public records subject to disclosure under the Public Records Act (“PRA”), RCW 42.56. … WebAug 28, 2015 · Today in Nissen v. Pierce County, the Washington Supreme Court unanimously held that records on a public employee’s private cell phone can be “public … nelft tics

Nissen v. Pierce County, Washington - gacities.com

WebMRSC - WA State Supreme/Appellate Court Decisions WebWith regard to government transparency, she is counsel in the Nissen v. Pierce County cases involving work-related text messages on the prosecutor’s personal cell phone. She has also sought injunctive relief and anti-SLAPP protections where warranted. WebAug 27, 2015 · The underlying case, Nissen v. Pierce County, pits the deputy against county government and the prosecutor. Four years ago, Nissen filed a records request with Pierce County, seeking... nelft what does it stand for

Nissen v. Pierce Cnty., No. 45039-9-II Casetext Search + Citator

MRSC - WA State Supreme/Appellate Court Decisions

Web3Nissen v. Pierce County, 183 Wn.2d 863, 357 P.3d 45 (2015). 2 One of the requests at issue in Nissensought not merely work- related records from Lindquist’s cell phone, but all records on the phone from a particular date, without any limitation. Nissen,183 Wn.2d at 869- … WebAug 27, 2015 · Nissen, a sheriff’s detective, sent two records requests concerning the Pierce County prosecutor asking for his cellular telephone records, including text messages … nelft walthamstowWebAug 27, 2015 · In Nissen, the Supreme Court presumed that Pierce County acted pursuant to a good-faith interpretation of the PRA when it denied Nissen's first request, and Pierce … nelft wheelchair service

"WebAug 28, 2015 · The case involved two PRA requests by Glenda Nissen, a county employee, related to Pierce County Prosecutor Mark Lindquist's use of his personal cell phone. It was undisputed that Lindquist “personally bought the phone, pays for its monthly service, and sometimes uses it in the course of his job.” " - Nissen v pierce county

Nissen v pierce county

Judgment goes against Lindquist Tacoma News Tribune

WebMay 14, 2024 · In Nissen v. Pierce County, 183 Wash.2d 863, the Washington Supreme Court found that “text messages sent and received by a public employee in the employee’s official capacity are public records of the employer, even if the employee uses a private cell phone.” In the case, the Pierce County prosecutor used his personal cell phone in the ... WebOct 28, 2016 · West v. Thurston County, (2012); Nissen v. Pierce County (2015). A writing may include data compiled for the issuance of a report (as well as the report itself), even though the agency had not intended to make the underlying data public. Yacobellis v. City of Bellingham (1989); see also O’Neill v.

Did you know?

WebNov 8, 2016 · B. Nissen v. Pierce County ¶13 Subsequent to West's request, the superior court's decision, and the parties' submission of appellate briefs, our Supreme Court decided Nissen, 183 Wn.2d 863. The parties then filed supplemental briefing addressing Nissen. The Nissen opinion is dispositive of the issues raised on appeal in this case. WebSUTTON, J. — Glenda Nissen appeals the trial court’s order dismissing her 2013 complaint and denying her request for sanctions and attorney’s fees and costs against Pierce …

WebAug 28, 2015 · On August 27, the Washington Supreme Court unanimously held in Nissen v. Pierce County that text messages sent or received by a public employee in his or her official capacity are public records within the meaning of the Public Records Act (PRA), even if the employee is using a personal cell phone. WebApr 12, 2024 · See Nissen v. Pierce County (2015). To be a public record, the call log must be "prepared, owned, used, or retained by any state or local agency" and relate to the conduct …

WebSep 9, 2014 · ¶ 2 Glenda Nissen is a detective with the Pierce County Sheriff's Department (Department) and a member of the Pierce County Deputy Sheriff's Guild (Guild). The … WebNissen v. Pierce County, 183 Wn. App. 581, 333 P.3d 577 (2014). This Court granted review. Unknown to the appellate courts in Nissen, Lindquist was personally involved in both the County’s unsuccessful defense in 3 Nissenand the drafting of amicus briefs filed in support of the County. CP 781.

WebAug 1, 2024 · Pierce County. 5 In Nissen, the court held that an elected county prosecutor’s text messages regarding work-related matters sent and received from his private cell phone could be public records. Following Nissen, additional case law is beginning to emerge, giving us a glimpse of what may eventually transpire in California.

WebJun 11, 2015 · Glenda NISSEN, an individual, Respondent, v. PIERCE COUNTY, a public agency, Pierce County Prosecuting Attorney's Office, a public agency, and Prosecutor … itom pythonWebThe case, Nissen v. Pierce County, is in its fourth year. The legal bills so far: at least $282,490, according to the latest figures from the county’s risk management department. The money has gone to outside attorneys, hired at public expense to defend Lindquist’s and the county’s position and guard his phone records. itom performance analysis softwareWebNissen v. Pierce County, 183 Wn.2d 863, 881, 357 P.3d 45 (2015). If, after consulting a dictionary, the statute is susceptible to more than one reasonable meaning, the statute is ambiguous and it is appropriate to use other statutory construction aids and examine the legislative history. Wrigley v. nelft trust headquartershttp://courts.mrsc.org/wacourtdecisions/183wn2d863slip.pdf itom pro servicenowWebNissen v. Pierce County, No. 90875-3 In response to these requests, Lindquist obtained and provided the County with two types of records. The first, which the parties refer to as the … itoms agentWebJan 17, 2024 · The Pierce County Council agreed to pay $950,000 to retired sheriff's deputy Glenda Nissen, ending an 8-year battle over former Prosecutor Mark Lindquist's text messages and associated claims... itoms conferenceWebFeb 25, 2024 · One clear example of this was a Washington Supreme Court case, Nissen v. Pierce County. In this case, the county sheriff requested the prosecutor’s call and text records. The prosecutor provided a call log and text message log, with the dates, times and telephone numbers of calls and messages. itom optimization what does it do servicenow